Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:17
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Where can Ukrainians go if they cannot have shelter and heating this winter?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Microsoft belatedly attempts to tame USB-C confusion with its rules for PC OEMs - Ars Technica
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Kanye West Shows Up At Sean 'Diddy' Combs’ Trial—And Quickly Leaves - Forbes
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Volcano Found Hiding 'In Plain Sight' Right Next to NASA Mars Rover - ScienceAlert
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What Malaki Starks Has Learned During OTAs - Baltimore Ravens
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
UNC Pours It On Arizona in Opener, Piles Up Super Regional Record - 247Sports